Planit Resource Centre

Industry Stats: Test Automation Utilisation 2012

Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | June 13, 2013

Despite the benefits of test automation, particularly in terms of potential cost savings, almost 40 percent of organisations are still not utilising automation in any significant capacity. This is a surprisingly high figure considering organisations’ focus on controlling project spending.

Of those who are using test automation, over 80 percent automate their functional regression testing and 64 percent use automation in test execution.

Planit Testing Index 2012: How Test Automation is Utilised
 

How Test Automation is Utilised

 

Book Early to Save 10% on Planit Training

Business Analysis Training | Software Testing Training | Specials | May 28, 2013

Early Bird Special

Put your training budget to good use. Develop the skills and capabilities necessary to ensure project success.

Industry Stats: How Performance Testing Is Conducted 2012

Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | May 23, 2013

The 2012 Index reported a marginal increase in the uptake of performance testing, with 24 percent of respondents now conducting performance testing as a key part of their projects. This still indicates 76 percent of organisations put a lower priority on performance testing, including 12 percent who do not conduct any performance testing.

Planit Testing Index 2012: How Performance Testing is Conducted

How Performance Testing is Conducted

 

Software Quality Assurance: Is it the same as Testing?

Latest Whitepapers | May 15, 2013

By Teji Chopra
Senior Test Consultant

ABSTRACT: This paper attempts to dispel some common misconceptions regarding the roles of Testing and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) by referring to existing industry information and extensive professional experience. It provides insights into the differences between these terms, while also outlining challenges and providing recommendations for successful SQA teams.

The terms Testing and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) are often used almost interchangeably in the IT industry with testing professionals often classed as quality assurance professionals.

So, are these terms the same?

Although both have quality as their overall objective, a fundamental difference between the two is that testing is performed after a product has been built, or in the case of static testing, after a document has been written. In contrast, quality assurance consists of activities to ensure that quality will be built into the product.

To appreciate the differences between Testing and SQA further, it is important to first understand the closely related concepts, Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA).

Industry Stats: Budget Allocations In-Depth 2012

Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | May 6, 2013

We have previously provided an overview of project budgets and allocations as reported in the 2012 Planit Testing Index, but how do these allocations differ across project sizes and across industries?

When analysing budget allocations against average project budgets, it is possible to see a clear difference in percentage of budgets allocated to quality assurance between smaller projects (project budgets < $5 million) and larger projects (> $5 million). Specifically, smaller projects tended to spent more on development (+6%) at the expense of requirements definition (-3%) and software testing (-2%).

Planit Testing Index 2012: Project Budget Allocations by Project Size

Small Project Budget Allocation
Project budgets < $5 million
Organisational View of Testing
Large Project Budget Allocation
Project budgets > $5 million
Organisational View of Testing

 

  Requirements     Design     Development     Testing     Implementation