Industry Stats: Test Automation Utilisation 2012
Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | June 13, 2013
Despite the benefits of test automation, particularly in terms of potential cost savings, almost 40 percent of organisations are still not utilising automation in any significant capacity. This is a surprisingly high figure considering organisations’ focus on controlling project spending.
Of those who are using test automation, over 80 percent automate their functional regression testing and 64 percent use automation in test execution.

Planit Testing Index 2012: How Test Automation is Utilised

Book Early to Save 10% on Planit Training
Business Analysis Training | Software Testing Training | Specials | May 28, 2013
Put your training budget to good use. Develop the skills and capabilities necessary to ensure project success.
Industry Stats: How Performance Testing Is Conducted 2012
Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | May 23, 2013
The 2012 Index reported a marginal increase in the uptake of performance testing, with 24 percent of respondents now conducting performance testing as a key part of their projects. This still indicates 76 percent of organisations put a lower priority on performance testing, including 12 percent who do not conduct any performance testing.

Planit Testing Index 2012: How Performance Testing is Conducted

Software Quality Assurance: Is it the same as Testing?
Latest Whitepapers | May 15, 2013
By Teji Chopra
Senior Test Consultant
ABSTRACT: This paper attempts to dispel some common misconceptions regarding the roles of Testing and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) by referring to existing industry information and extensive professional experience. It provides insights into the differences between these terms, while also outlining challenges and providing recommendations for successful SQA teams.
The terms Testing and Software Quality Assurance (SQA) are often used almost interchangeably in the IT industry with testing professionals often classed as quality assurance professionals.
So, are these terms the same?
Although both have quality as their overall objective, a fundamental difference between the two is that testing is performed after a product has been built, or in the case of static testing, after a document has been written. In contrast, quality assurance consists of activities to ensure that quality will be built into the product.
To appreciate the differences between Testing and SQA further, it is important to first understand the closely related concepts, Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA). 
Industry Stats: Budget Allocations In-Depth 2012
Industry Stats | Planit Testing Index | May 6, 2013
We have previously provided an overview of project budgets and allocations as reported in the 2012 Planit Testing Index, but how do these allocations differ across project sizes and across industries?
When analysing budget allocations against average project budgets, it is possible to see a clear difference in percentage of budgets allocated to quality assurance between smaller projects (project budgets < $5 million) and larger projects (> $5 million). Specifically, smaller projects tended to spent more on development (+6%) at the expense of requirements definition (-3%) and software testing (-2%).

Planit Testing Index 2012: Project Budget Allocations by Project Size
| Small Project Budget Allocation Project budgets < $5 million ![]() |
Large Project Budget Allocation Project budgets > $5 million ![]() |
Requirements |
Design |
Development |
Testing |
Implementation |
Latest Whitepapers
- Software Quality Assurance: Is it the same as Testing?
- Web Services Testing
- Agile Mindset
- Working with a Distributed Team
- Traditional vs. Agile methodologies
Planit Testing Index
- Industry Stats: Test Automation Utilisation 2012
- Industry Stats: How Performance Testing Is Conducted 2012
- Industry Stats: Budget Allocations In-Depth 2012
- Industry Stats: Organisational View of Testing 2012
- Industry Stats: When Testing Starts 2012
Press Releases
- Planit joins Australian Banking & Financial Technology Summit as a Gold Sponsor
- UK contender Facilita enters the battle for the Australian Performance Testing Tool market
- Software Development shakes-off the GFC-blues but cannot escape trouble
- Planit brings Learntesting to Australia and New Zealand
- Failed software projects still a reality for Australian and New Zealand Organisations




Requirements
Design
Development
Testing
Implementation